Legal Opinion

Herbert A. Middendorf v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1980No. 78-3147, 78-3148PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

This' is a diversity action in which the district court entered judgment declaring the defendant liable for rents and for damage to the reversionary interest of the plaintiffs under a long-term lease of real estate. Following lengthy proceedings the court entered its findings of fact and conclusions of law which included a finding that the reversionary interest of the plaintiffs in the real estate had been damaged to the extent of $350,000 by the defendant’s breach of an obligation of the lease to keep the premises in good repair at all times. The parties then stipulated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blosser v. EnderlinOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Tobin v. Union News Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. Pepper v. Dixie Splint Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Tobin v. Union News Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Corbett v. Derman Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ed Miller & Sons, Inc. v. EarlNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Avalon Pacific-Santa Ana, L.P. v. HD Supply Repair & Remodel, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Shapiro v. D. H. Overmyer Co. (In Re D. H. Overmyer Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  4. Ohio Environmental Development Ltd. Partnership v. Envirotest Systems Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  5. Kelly v. Alstores Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API