Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. D. H. Overmyer Co. (In Re D. H. Overmyer Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1981No. 19-22329PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOEL LEWITTES, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Natalie Shapiro and Harry I. Subin, as trustees and doing business as Arcadia Enterprises (“lessors” or “plaintiffs”), have commenced this adversary proceeding 1 against the substantively consolidated Chapter XI debtors 2 , D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. (Texas), as lessee of the subject premises (“lessee” or “DHO Texas”) and D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. (Ohio) (“DHO Ohio”) as guarantor of the lessee’s lease obligations (collectively referred to sometimes as (“defendants”).
Plaintiffs, in their complaint, which was served upon defendants on…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Triangle Laboratories, Inc. v. HalvajianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Adeline Nadler, Robert B. Nadler and Carole M. Nadler v. American Motors Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Hadar Leasing International Co. v. D.H. Overmyer Telecasting Co. (In Re D.H. Overmyer Telecasting Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
- Bistrian v. Easthampton Sand & Gravel Co. (In Re Easthampton Sand & Gravel Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Hassett v. McColley (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.