Legal Opinion

Pepper v. Dixie Splint Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 19, 1935PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

A motion was made to hear this appeal ex parte upon the brief of the appellee because the appellant failed to state in the petition for the appeal that she desired to adopt the petition as her opening brief. Some sixty days before the appeal was heard by this court counsel for the appellant notified counsel for appellee in writing that the petition would be adopted as the opening brief. No injury, prejudice or surprise to the appellee has resulted from the failure to state in the petition that it would be adopted as the opening brief. We therefore overrule the motion.

Motion was made to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Luedecke v. Des Moines Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. City of Norfolk v. Norfolk CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  3. Craufurd's Adm'r v. Smith's Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  4. Langhorne v. Richmond Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. Cosmopolitan Life Insurance Co. v. KoegelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Steyr-Daimler-Puch of America Corp. v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. Harris v. T.I., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  4. Wheat, First Securities, Inc. v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Trucking Corporation v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API