Legal Opinion
Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Branyan
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 1894No. 1,166PublishedCited by 14 opinions
From the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.
A demurrer was sustained to the first paragraph of the complaint. The second paragraph was withdrawn during the trial.
This leaves the case standing upon the third paragraph, which we set out in full:
“The plaintiff, William A. Branyan, Administrator of the estate of Charles W. Simons, deceased, for a further and third paragraph of his complaint, complains of the Chicago and Erie Railroad Company, and says that defendant is now, and was on the 11th day of June, 1891, a corporation, owning and operating a line of railroad through the county of Huntington, in said State, and doing the business of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Birkett v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- L. N. Brunswig & Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Board of Commissioners v. LeggIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Glantz v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ruehl v. Lidgerwood Rural Telephone Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Jackson v. Record, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
- Ferreira v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1905
- Wabash Railroad v. McDonielsIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Hegberg v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.