L. N. Brunswig & Co. v. White
Texas Supreme Court
Error from. Tarrant. Tried below before the Hon. A. J. Booty. In this case the chief objection to the charge of the court was to the following portion of it: “And the value of the child’s services during the period of her minority is to be ascertained by you as best you can from your own judgment, common sense and sound discretion, and the evidence before you.”
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Associate Justice.
E. L. and C. E. White, the parents of Chalcy White, their daughter, about six years old *506at her death, sued appellees for negligently causing her death. Appellees, in their petition, allege, in substance, that they were on the thirtieth day of August, 1883, husband wife, the parents of said infant, who was about six years old; that on said day appellants were wholesale and retail druggists, doing' ■business in the city of Fort Worth; that on the twenty-ninth day of August, 1883, their said child being sick, appellee, E. L. White, told his brother, George White, who…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. CowserTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ShannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. NixonTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. LydeTexas Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by51 opinions
- Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BallewTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. LacyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Hargadene, McKittrick & Co. v. WhitfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1888
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.