Legal Opinion

State v. Newberry

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1989No. 1595PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

This matter came on for consideration upon appellee’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has not filed a memorandum contra.

The underlying appeal is from an order filed by the Ross County Court of Common Pleas denying the motion of Brenda Newberry, defendant-appellant, for a hearing on the denial of her admission to the Ross County Diversion Program.

Appellant assigned the following error, which is phrased as a statement:

“Admission to a prosecutor’s diversion program authorized by R.C. 2935.36 is a benefit entitled to protection by due process under the Ohio…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State ex rel. Leis v. KraftOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. EberhardtOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Paige v. LisottoOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. Rattray, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API