State v. Newberry
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
This matter came on for consideration upon appellee’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has not filed a memorandum contra.
The underlying appeal is from an order filed by the Ross County Court of Common Pleas denying the motion of Brenda Newberry, defendant-appellant, for a hearing on the denial of her admission to the Ross County Diversion Program.
Appellant assigned the following error, which is phrased as a statement:
“Admission to a prosecutor’s diversion program authorized by R.C. 2935.36 is a benefit entitled to protection by due process under the Ohio…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Leis v. KraftOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. EberhardtOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Paige v. LisottoOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. Rattray, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005