Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Paige v. Lisotto
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1997No. 97 C.A. 111Published
1Per curiam
Relator has filed on June 6, 1997, an alternative complaint in prohibition or mandamus seeking to exclude “other acts” evidence to be admitted into evidence from relator’s capital trial.
The requisite elements to obtain a writ of prohibition or mandamus are stated in State ex rel. Aycock v. Mowrey (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 347, 349, 544 N.E.2d 657, 659-660:
“For a writ of prohibition to issue, a relator must establish (1) that the court or officer against whom the writ is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) that the exercise of that a power is unauthorized by law, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Leis v. KraftOhio Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.