Legal Opinion

People v. Disimone

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 2002No. Docket 234436PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilder, P.J.

The prosecution appeals by leave granted 1 from the April 27, 2001, circuit court holding that a conviction under MCL 168.932a(e) requires the prosecutor to prove that defendant had a specific criminal intent rather than a general intent. We reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

1. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

This case involves defendant’s voting activity in the November 7, 2000, general election. On that date, defendant went to a voting precinct in Grant Township and presented to the election workers what appeared to be a valid voter registration card that listed him as a Grant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. Borchard-RuhlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. McLaughlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. FennellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. MaynorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. McDanielMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People of Michigan v. Tyisha Monika ToliverMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API