Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Aluminum Co. of America

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 18, 1926No. 2624PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

Prom the record in this ease, the following appears:

A writ of summons and attachment in the usual form obtaining in this district, except that it was directed, not only “to the marshal of our district of Massachusetts, or his deputy,” but also “to the marshal of the Western district of Pennsylvania, or his deputy,” issued out of this court on the 21st day of September, 1925. In the writ the Aluminum Company of America, a Pennsylvania corporation, together with eight individual defendants, none of whom were citizens of Massachusetts, were named as defendants.

On…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hansen Packing Co. v. Armour & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  2. Westor Theatres, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  3. Fifth & Walnut, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. Buckeye Associates, Ltd. v. Fila Sports, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  5. Don George, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API