Legal Opinion

Hansen Packing Co. v. Armour & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 30, 1936PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

This case involves two causes of action, both for treble damages under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.) and Clayton Act (38 Stat. 730). Suit was originally brought against Armour & Co., an Illinois corporation (hereafter the Illinois corporation). Subsequently, plaintiff was granted leave to join Armour & Co. of Delaware, a Delaware corporation (hereafter the Delaware corporation) and 'Armour & Co. of New Jersey, a New Jersey corporation (hereafter the New Jersey corporation), as defendants. The amended supplemental complaint thereafter served -upon…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. George Arnott v. The American Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1971
  5. Goldlawr, Incorporated v. ShubertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API