Cyrix Corporation, and Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc., and International Business MacHines Corporation v. Intel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Intel Corporation appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas entering judgment in favor of Cyrix Corporation, SGS-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc. (ST), and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), and holding that IBM and ST acted within the scope of their respective patent license agreements with Intel when IBM made, and ST had made, products for Cyrix. Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp., 879 F.Supp. 672 (E.D.Tex.1995). Because the district court correctly interpreted the IBM-Intel and ST-Intel agreements and hence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Charles C. Johnston and Gordon P. Ramsey, as Trustees of the Amec Liquidating Trust v. Ivac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Intel Corporation v. Ulsi System Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- United States v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re Cambridge Biotech Corporation Institut Pasteur and Genetic Systems Corporation v. Cambridge Biotech Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Hilgraeve Corporation v. Symantec Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Vulcan Engineering Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Fata Aluminium, Inc., and Fata Group, S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.