Legal Opinion

Cowan v. Schmidle

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 1993No. 92-564PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellees, Gus and Martha Schmidle, alleged their neighbors, the appellants Gerold and Bonnie Cowan, allowed their holding pond for chicken litter to overflow causing harm to the Schmidles’ property. The Cowans filed a number of defensive motions, such as for dismissal pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and for summary judgment on the Schmidles’ compensatory and punitive damages claims.

The Schmidles ultimately took a voluntary nonsuit pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P.41 (a), yet the Cowans appeal asserting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Robinson v. Craighead County Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Ward v. Dapper Dan Cleaners and Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Bratton v. GunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Ratzlaff v. Franz Foods of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Miles v. SouthernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beverly Enterprises-Arkansas, Inc. v. HillierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Haile v. Arkansas Power and Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Chlanda v. KillebrewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API