Legal Opinion

Haile v. Arkansas Power and Light Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 1995No. 95-355PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellants, Charles Arwood Haile, David Haile, and Brian Haile (the Hailes) seek reversal of a partial summary judgment entered in an action brought by them against Arkansas Power and Light Company (AP&L). We must dismiss the appeal because the Trial Court’s order is not a final order.

Depositions before the Trial Court when the partial summary judgment order was entered showed the following. In 1984 the Hailes built a new milking parlor at their dairy farm. Electricity for the parlor was supplied by AP&L. After milking operations commenced in the new milking parlor,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fratesi v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Ratzlaff v. Franz Foods of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Wilburn v. Keenan Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Cowan v. SchmidleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Renfro v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. State Office of Child Support Enforcement v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Driggers v. LockeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc. v. Advanced Control Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Schlader v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API