Legal Opinion
B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Peck
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1954No. 33628Published
1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.
The property involved, if “subject to taxation,” was so subject only because it was “personal property located and used in business in this state.” See Section 5328, General Code. It was located in Ohio. Whether it was “used in business” in Ohio depends upon the provisions of Section 5325-1, General Code, reading:
“Within the meaning of the term ‘used in business,’ occurring in this title, personal property shall be considered to be ‘used’ when employed or utilized in con*204nection with ordinary or. special operations, when acquired or held as means or instruments for carrying on the business,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Zangerle v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- Caldwell v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.