Legal Opinion

Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1945No. 30302 and 30303PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The appellant claims that it is a manufacturer with reference to the iron ore involved in this controversy, within the meaning of Section 5385, General Code, and that such ore constitutes “manufactured articles” within the meaning of Section 5388 (2), General Code.

The facts essential to a consideration of the questions presented may be summarized as follows:

The appellant, The Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company, is an Ohio corporation with its principal office located in Cleveland, Ohio. For many years it has been engaged in the business of producing and selling iron ore to manufacturers of iron…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. France Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Schumacher Stone Co. v. Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Middletown Iron & Steel Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Akron Home Medical Services, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Benken v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Stoneco, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Emil Olson, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API