Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1926No. 19943PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This cause originated in the court of common pleas of Franklin county, Ohio, as an action by the state of Ohio to recover of Caldwell & Taylor the tax upon the benzol ingredient of benzol gas, under the so-called “gaso line tax act.” Caldwell & Taylor are dealers as defined by that act, and have paid the tax upon the gasoline ingredient in the benzol gas sold by them, but they refuse to pay the tax upon the benzol ingredient, claiming that it is not subject to tax under the provisions of that act. The controversy involves no question except the interpretation of the gasoline tax act (111 Ohio…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cassidy v. EllerhorstOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Clay v. Cuyahoga Cty. Med. Examiner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Shaffer v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City of Toledo v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Watson v. Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API