Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Gue

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1912No. 7,558PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Prom Martin Circuit Court; Hileary Q. Houghton, Judge. Action by Clyde Gue against the Continental Insurance Company and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant insurance company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

— Appellant issued its policy of insurance to Clyde Gue and Louisa Gue, as owners of a certain dwelling-house and contents, indemnifying them for a certain term against loss or damage by fire. Within the life of the policy, the house was wholly destroyed by fire, and this action was instituted by Clyde Gue against appellant and Louisa Gue.

*233The facts relating to the contract of insurance, the loss and proof of loss, are all set out in the complaint. It is also averred that at the time the insurance was written, and at the time the building was destroyed, plaintiff, Clyde Gue, was the sole owner…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. FrankelIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Gregory v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Abshire v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bozeman v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helms v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Blose v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Schultze v. MaleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Gates v. WeyenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Stoup v. StoupIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API