Legal Opinion

Stoup v. Stoup

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1941No. 16,769PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevenson, J.

The appellee, Clyde Stoup, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, for the reason that the Appellate Court has no jurisdiction over the person of the appellee. In support of the motion to dismiss this appeal, the appellee calls our attention to the following facts as disclosed by the record.

'The appellant, Pauline A. Stoup, commenced this action against William W. Stoup for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from the said William W. Stoup'. William W. Stoup, as husband of the appellant, filed a cross-complaint in the original action, asking that a divorce be granted him, and further…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Helms v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Continental Insurance v. GueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Pabst Brewing Co. v. SchusterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Sindlinger v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lemp v. LempNevada Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Angelli v. SherwaySupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. American Trust & Savings Bank v. GrippIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Schleicher v. Gary National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API