Legal Opinion

Hampe v. Schaffer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 19, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ajypeal from Washington District Qourt. — Hon. D. Ryan, Judge. Action in equity to foreclose a mortgage on lands, securing a promissory note. .There was a decree granting the relief payed for in .-the petition.- Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

— I. The defendants in their answer pleaded the bar of the statute of limitations. The abstract shows the facts involved in this defense to be as follows: An original notice for service was placed in the hands of the sheriff of the county wherein the action was commenced, before the expiration of the time in which the action could have been commenced, and before that time was served upon one of the defendants, who, it is alleged, claims some interest in the mortgaged property. After the expiration of that time, notices were issued and served upon the maker of the *564note, the mortgagors and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Galehouse v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & S. S. M. R. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Larson v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ArmstrongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Bracken v. McAlveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API