Legal Opinion

Peake v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided June 21, 2005No. 0279042PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OVERTON, Judge.

Tried by the court sitting without a jury, Jeremy Austin Peake (appellant) was convicted of possessing marijuana with the intent to distribute it. On appeal, appellant contends principles of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel barred his conviction. 1 Finding no merit in these contentions, we affirm appellant’s conviction.

FACTS

“On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’ ” Archer v. Common wealth, 26 Va.App. 1, 11, 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (citation omitted).

On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lane v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  2. Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  3. Tharrington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  4. Phelps v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  5. Antonio Keith Lappegard v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API