Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 26, 2011No. 1292102PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALEY, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appealing his conviction for unauthorized use of an automobile in violation of Code § 18.2-102, Mikeema Taylor argues (1) the evidence was insufficient to show he knew his use was unauthorized and (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove venue. We hold Taylor has failed to preserve his first argument for appeal. However, as we agree venue was improper, we remand the case for a new trial.

II. BACKGROUND

At around 7:00 a.m. on January 30, 2009, the victim left her house in Colonial Heights and started her car to let it warm in preparation for driving to work.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Riner v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  2. Cheng v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  3. Meeks v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. Keesee v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  5. Pollard v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jason N. Creamer v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  2. Larwan Badru Bonner v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  3. Emily Lynn Aponte v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
  4. Roberson v. City of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  5. Brent Edward Tanner v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API