Legal Opinion

Brear v. Sweet

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1930No. 22197. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

This is a malpractice action. The respondent Paul Sweet is a physician and surgeon and conducts the Sweet Clinic. Eva Brear went to the hospital conducted by the Sweet Clinic and, upon an examination being made, it was discovered that she was suffering from what appeared to be a cancerous growth in the uterus, and it was found necessary to remove the uterus. This operation was performed by respondent, and it was charged that, in performing such operation, “the defendant carelessly and negligently cut the bladder of the plaintiff, making a large hole therein through which the bladder leaked.”

It…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Dishman v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Thomson v. Virginia Mason HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Inglis v. MortonWashington Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hart v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Fritz v. HorsfallWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Shoberg v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. Richison v. NunnWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Halligan v. CottonNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API