Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Virginia Mason Hospital

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1929No. 21442. Department TwoPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action for malpractice. The appellants, Thomson, are husband and wife. The respondent Virginia Mason Hospital is a corporation, and is engaged in the business of conducting a hospital. The respondents I). H. Houston and A. H. Gray are physicians and surgeons, and engage in the same line of general practice; they are associates, rather than partners, and work under an agreement to the effect that, when one of them is called to attend upon a patient, and is unable at the time to answer the call, the other will attend the patient for the time being. In 1924, Mrs. Thomson became…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Morton v. MooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. MelroseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API