Sato v. Tawata
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOON, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellants Russell Sato (Sato) and Shelley I. Sato [hereinafter collectively, appellants] appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to special verdict following a jury trial. Briefly, the facts indicate that Sato was injured in an automobile accident when a car, driven by defendant-appellee Stephanie Tawata, collided into a Love’s Bakery truck driven by Sato. At trial, Tawata was allowed to introduce, over appellants’ objection, evidence of workers’ compensation benefits Sato had received. On appeal, appellants contend that, because Hawai'i Revised Statutes…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Kealoha v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Montalvo v. LapezHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CamaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.