Legal Opinion

Sato v. Tawata

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1995No. 16388PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants Russell Sato (Sato) and Shelley I. Sato [hereinafter collectively, appellants] appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to special verdict following a jury trial. Briefly, the facts indicate that Sato was injured in an automobile accident when a car, driven by defendant-appellee Stephanie Tawata, collided into a Love’s Bakery truck driven by Sato. At trial, Tawata was allowed to introduce, over appellants’ objection, evidence of workers’ compensation benefits Sato had received. On appeal, appellants contend that, because Hawai'i Revised Statutes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kealoha v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Montalvo v. LapezHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. CamaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API