Legal Opinion

Makeig v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 14, 1990No. 07-89-0353-CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

This appeal was perfected to question the efficacy of a final judgment rendered on an appearance bond given in a felony offense. Approximately three months after rendition of judgment nisi on a $50,000 bond executed by Nazario Dominguez Lopez, as principal, and Undine Makeig, d/b/a E-Z Bail Bond, as surety, the trial court rendered final judgment. Makeig’s subsequent motion for remittitur after forfeiture was granted only to the extent that the court ordered a partial remittitur of $25,-000, less costs of suit.

With four points of error, Makeig contends the trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Armadillo Bail Bonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Balboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Fly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. State v. CamaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. PENALOZA v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  4. Michael Angel Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  5. Makeig v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API