Clark v. City of Humansville, Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Presiding Judge.
In this action for damages of $5,-400, plaintiffs’ appeal is from the order of the circuit court sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Since the order did not specify otherwise, the dismissal was with prejudice and operated as an adjudication upon the merits. Rule 67.03, V.A.M.R.; V.A.M.S. § 510.150. Of course, the motion to dismiss admitted, for the purposes of'the motion, the truth of all facts well pleaded therein and any inferences fairly deducible therefrom; and, on this…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan v. Community Health PlanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- St. Joseph Light & Power Co. v. Kaw Valley Tunneling, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- City of Columbia v. Paul N. Howard Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Murphy v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.