Legal Opinion
Brune v. McDonald
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
On November 6, 1936, plaintiff, Evelyn Bruñe, instituted this action against defendant, Ted McDonald.
It appears from the' original complaint of plaintiff that on the 16th day of August defendant was driving his automobile, with plaintiff as his guest therein, in a northerly direction, traveling from the Clackamas County side of Mount Hood on the Mount Hood Loop road, toward Hood River, and that, when in the vicinity of Van Horn, defendant drove his automobile off the highway, along the • edge thereof, across a culvert, through a fence and into a tree, causing injuries to plaintiff.
To support…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Allegretto v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Lewis v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Bauer v. . DeweyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Ladd & Tilton Bank v. RosensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Mursener v. ForteOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Rendler v. Lincoln CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Corridan v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.