Legal Opinion

Rendler v. Lincoln County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1986No. TC 41260; CA A32003; SC S32431PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

Plaintiffs, landowners in Lincoln County, filed suit against the county for a declaration that an unimproved county road, known as “804,” had been vacated or abandoned. The circuit court allowed The Committee to Save Yachats 804 Trail, Inc. (“the committee”), to intervene and to file a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that County Road 804 continues to exist, that it is a “public easement by prescription,” and that “the public has a prescriptive easement over any part of the pedestrian right of way not falling within the confines of County Road 804 and/or that the same has been…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Local No. 290 v. Oregon Department of Environmental QualityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Automobile Club v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. MT & M Gaming, Inc. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Oregon Taxpayers United PAC v. KeislingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API