Legal Opinion

Ladd & Tilton Bank v. Rosenstein

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1922No. 17215PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— The only question in this case is that concerning the bringing in of new parties.

The complaint alleges that, sometime prior to the institution of the suit, R. M. Wade & Company assigned to the plaintiff two written trade acceptances, drawn by it against the defendant and which the defendant had accepted and agreed to pay, and that the acceptances were past due and defendant had refused to pay them, although demand therefor had been made; that Wade & Company had, before maturity and for a valuable consideration, assigned the acceptances to the plaintiff, who was the bona fide owner and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clay County Land Co. v. AlcoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Goodrich v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Alaska Pacific Navigation Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Adjustment Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Bankers' Nat. Bank v. Security Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brune v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Chesney v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hanson v. Johnson Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Johnson v. CullinanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Harlow Realty Co. v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API