Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of D. W.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 2007No. A06-2069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

The state charged appellant D.W. with aiding and abetting a second-degree assault involving a dangerous weapon other than a firearm. Because D.W. was 17 years old at the time of the crime and the state believes this is a presumptive-certification offense, the state moved to certify the case for adult prosecution. The district court agreed that this is a presumptive-certification case but denied the motion to certify and instead designated the case as an extended-jurisdiction-juvenile (EJJ) case. Appellant challenges the EJJ designation order dated August 23, 2006,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mertins v. Commissioner of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API