In Re the Welfare of D. W.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
The state charged appellant D.W. with aiding and abetting a second-degree assault involving a dangerous weapon other than a firearm. Because D.W. was 17 years old at the time of the crime and the state believes this is a presumptive-certification offense, the state moved to certify the case for adult prosecution. The district court agreed that this is a presumptive-certification case but denied the motion to certify and instead designated the case as an extended-jurisdiction-juvenile (EJJ) case. Appellant challenges the EJJ designation order dated August 23, 2006,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mertins v. Commissioner of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008