Legal Opinion
State v. Monroe
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 11, 1998No. 96-139PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The defendant, Michael Monroe, was convicted of second degree murder. See RSA 630:l-b (1996). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court (Hampsey, J.) erred by: (1) admitting his involuntary confessions; (2) admitting statements, including confessions, he made without fresh Miranda warnings following a polygraph examination; (3) excluding evidence of his son’s prior bad acts; (4) admitting hearsay testimony from the lead investigator; and (5) denying requested funds for an expert witness to testify regarding false confessions. We affirm.
On the night of March 6, 1993, Theresa Levesque, the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Commonwealth v. RiveraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- State v. DispotoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- State v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.