Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Goettl Air Conditioning, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1999No. CV-97-0511-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Justice.

¶ 1 Goettl Air Conditioning (Goettl) and Washington Street Investments (WSI) entered a lease agreement that included a provision requiring Goettl, the lessee, to indemnify and hold harmless WSI, the lessor, against specified claims and expenses. We accepted review to determine whether and, if so, to what extent, Goettl is bound by a stipulated judgment that WSI entered to settle a tort action in which the plaintiff, alleging he suffered injuries on the leased premises, named WSI as a defendant.

I

¶ 2 Mark Cunningham, an employee of Goettl, fell through a skylight on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Jesik v. Maricopa County Community College DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Fagerberg v. Phoenix Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Rager v. Superior Coach Sales & Service of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 v. Baglino Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. MT BUILDERS, LLC v. Fisher Roofing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Espinoza v. SchulenburgArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. A.P.S. Rent-A-Car & Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API