Legal Opinion

State v. Andre M. Chamblis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2015No. 2012AP002782-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. Andre Chamblis (Chamblis) pleaded guilty to operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) as a sixth offense in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(l)(b) (2011-12).1 Prior to accepting the plea, the circuit court2 informed Chamblis that the offense constituted a Class H felony which carried a minimum penalty of 6 months imprisonment and a $600 fine and a maximum penalty of 6 years imprisonment (three years confinement and three years extended supervision) and a $10,000 fine. Wis. Stat. §§ 346.65(2)(am)5., 939.50(3)(h)., 973.01(2)(b)8. The circuit court ultimately sentenced…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Glenn T. ZamzowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. Timothy L. Finley, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. David GutierrezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Mandujano v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  5. Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Robin VosWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API