Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mandujano v. Mendoza

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 25, 2018No. Appeal No. 2018AP109Published

1Opinion of the Court

REILLY, P.J.1

¶ 1 Laura Mandujano appeals pro se from an order denying her motion to reopen a default judgment dismissing her case with prejudice and awarding attorney's fees to Jose Mendoza for her failure to appear at trial. As Mandujano failed to show good cause to reopen the default judgment, we affirm.

¶ 2 On July 24, 2017, Mandujano initiated a small claims action against Mendoza, alleging that he owed her $9300 for a "roofing/wrapping job" that he did not complete. The case was set for a bench trial on November 6, 2017. On October 30, 2017, Mandujano filed an agreement to adjourn the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. AveryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Dugenske v. DugenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Martin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API