Legal Opinion

Heald v. Hendy

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1891No. 13094PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and "county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

— This is an action to recover $2,370.48 on account of goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant, at his special instance and request, and also for money paid and expended for the use of defendant, in the sum of $827.47, on a balance of account.

Plaintiff asks judgment for the amounts, and interest upon the items of the account from the time they became due.

Defendant admits a certain amount of the indebtedness, and denies the balance.

At the trial, judgment went against him, and he appeals from the judgment, and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

*634The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Brady v. WilcoxsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Bank of California v. NorthamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Curtin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Erickson v. Stockton & Tuolumne Cty. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1905
  4. American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Grangers' Union v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API