Legal Opinion

Sampson v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2001No. S-9338PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Kevin Sampson and Jane Doe were mentally competent, terminally ill adults who sued for an order declaring their physicians exempt from Alaska's manslaughter statute for the purpose of assisting them to commit suicide. The superior court entered summary judgment against Sampson and Doe, and they appealed. We affirm the judgment, concluding that the Alaska Constitution's guarantees of privacy and liberty do not afford terminally ill patients the right to a physician's assistance in committing suicide and that Alaska's manslaughter statute did not violate…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Myers v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. Planned Parenthood of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Doe v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API