Legal Opinion

United States v. Luckinbill

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 21, 1933No. 768PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Luckinbill brought this action against the United States to recover on a policy of war risk insurance. Trial by jury was waived and the cause tried to the court. At the close of all the evidence, counsel for the government moved for judgment in its favor on the ground that no substantial evidence was introduced which showed that Luckinbill was totally and permanently disabled during the life of the policy. The motion was overruled and judgment was entered for Luckinbill.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the court erred in overruling such motion.

•…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Runkle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. United States v. HarthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Proechel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  5. Hanagan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SteadmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. United States v. DerrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. RyeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. United States v. BodgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  5. Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API