Legal Opinion

Hanagan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 31, 1932No. 4637PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

It is too plain for discussion that, i£ the record discloses substantial evidence to support the finding and judgment of the trial court, it cannot be disturbed on appeal. It appears that, while in the service in Prance, Ilanagan was severely wounded just above the left knee. He was treated in various hospitals and has been in hospitals or soldiers’ homes most of the time since his injury. The kneejoint has become ankvlosed. In course of time a false joint formed just above the knee, which gives Mm some movement of the leg below that joint.

Por a considerable time bo used crutches to get…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. WeeksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. DerrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Berry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API