Legal Opinion

Pittman v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1999No. 25025PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Justice:

The State appeals the post-conviction relief (“PCR”) court’s order granting Timothy Pittman (“Pittman”) a new trial. We affirm.

Pittman was indicted for assault and battery with intent to kill (“ABIK”), possession of a gun during the commission of a violent crime, armed robbery, and criminal conspiracy. Pittman pled guilty as charged to all indicted offenses. The trial court sentenced Pittman to confinement for a cumulative period of twenty years. Pittman then filed a PCR application. He alleged that an involuntary guilty plea and ineffective assistance of counsel rendered his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. RaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Harres v. LeekeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. LambertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Wolfe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Antwan HeywardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Holden v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Burnett v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Stalk v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API