Legal Opinion

Stalk v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 5, 2007No. 4298PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

The post-conviction relief (PCR) court granted James Stalk’s (Stalk) application for relief after finding Stalk’s guilty plea was involuntary due to counsel’s unreasonable conduct and failure to prepare. This court granted the State’s petition to review the PCR court’s decision. We reverse.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Stalk was indicted on one count of first-degree burglary and six counts of second degree burglary, four counts of grand larceny, and one count of aggravated resisting arrest. The first-degree burglary was reduced to second-degree. Stalk pled guilty to all charges. He was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stalk v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API