Legal Opinion

Harres v. Leeke

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1984No. 22039PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

Respondents William Thomas Harres, Harry Moses, and Roger E. Lanford pled guilty to exhibiting obscene films and were sentenced. They were subsequently granted post-conviction relief, and the State appeals. We reverse.

Respondents, represented by counsel retained for them by their employer, appeared during the second week of General Sessions Court in Spartanburg, presided over by Judge Tim-merman, and pled guilty to several counts of exhibiting obscene films. The prior week of court was presided over by Judge Moss (former Chief Justice of this Court) who was referred to by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whetsell v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Vickery v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Roddy v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Wolfe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Wroten v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API