State v. Olivar
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
A jury found defendant guilty of three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred in ruling that incriminating statements that he made to the police on two separate dates were admissible in evidence. With respect to the first occasion, he contends that he made the statements under compelling circumstances without having been given Miranda warnings. With respect to the second occasion, he made statements first to one police officer and then to another. The trial court admitted only the statements to the second officer. Defendant does…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barrett v. BellequeOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009