Legal Opinion

State v. Shepherd

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 30, 2010No. F15447; A139075PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to unauthorized use of a vehicle, attempting to elude a police officer while in a motor vehicle, and driving under the influence of intoxicants. As part of defendant’s sentence, the court ordered her to pay $18,145.30 in restitution, ORS 137.106, and $1,200 as a compensatory fine, ORS 137.101. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in ordering the compensatory fine because such fines are authorized only for objectively verifiable monetary losses and the state did not adduce any evidence that the $1,200 met that criterion. Because that argument differs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Barrett v. BellequeOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. OlivarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Stonecrest Properties, LLC v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Holbert v. NoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. PIH Beaverton LLC v. Red Shield Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API