Legal Opinion

Morehead Banking Co. v. Walker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Civil action tried before Tmiherlahe, J., and a jury at June (Special) Term, 1897, of Durham Superior Court. There was a verdict for the defendant and from the judgment thereon, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Montgomery, J.:

The defendants admitted the execution of the note, which recited a consideration, but averred payment, and asked to assume the burden on the trial. The Court held that this course was a proper one and the plaintiffs excepted. His Honor was right in refusing to sustain the exception. Stronach v. Bledsoe, 85 N. C., 473; Carrington v. Allen, 87 N. C., 354. The plaintiffs offered as a witness the cashier of plaintiff bank, who was also a stockholder, to prove that in an alleged conversation between himself and Sellars, the intestate of the defendant, and the principal of the note,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shober v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Carrington v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Stronach v. . BledsoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Michaux v. Paul Rubber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Bell v. GrimstadMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Rooks v. . BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. T. C. May Co. v. Menzies Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API