Morehead Banking Co. v. Walker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action tried before Tmiherlahe, J., and a jury at June (Special) Term, 1897, of Durham Superior Court. There was a verdict for the defendant and from the judgment thereon, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Montgomery, J.:
The defendants admitted the execution of the note, which recited a consideration, but averred payment, and asked to assume the burden on the trial. The Court held that this course was a proper one and the plaintiffs excepted. His Honor was right in refusing to sustain the exception. Stronach v. Bledsoe, 85 N. C., 473; Carrington v. Allen, 87 N. C., 354. The plaintiffs offered as a witness the cashier of plaintiff bank, who was also a stockholder, to prove that in an alleged conversation between himself and Sellars, the intestate of the defendant, and the principal of the note,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shober v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Carrington v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Stronach v. . BledsoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hunt v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Michaux v. Paul Rubber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Bell v. GrimstadMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Rooks v. . BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- T. C. May Co. v. Menzies Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.