Legal Opinion

Bell v. Grimstad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1928No. 6,215PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover from O. King Grimstad as defendant the sum of $7,868.05, a balance alleged to be due on the sale of a band of sheep, together with the sum of $1,100, the value of certain Liberty bonds, with interest on both items, which total $8,968.05, from March, 1922. Issue was joined by an answer and reply thereto, and the cause was brought on for trial before the court sitting with a jury. At the conclusion of all of the evidence introduced by the parties, plaintiff and defendant, the court sustained the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Lerche v. . BrasherNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Carroll v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Nord v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Puutio v. RomanMontana Supreme Court · 1926

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Durocher v. MyersMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Stranahan v. Independent Natural Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McGonigle v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Simons v. JenningsMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Carlos Warehouse v. ThomasSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API