Legal Opinion

Rooks v. . Bruce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

Tbis is an action to recover damages for injuries alleged to bave been inflicted by an unlawful and willful assault upon tbe plaintiff by tbe defendants.. Tbe appellant assigns as error tbe granting of a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit as to tbe defendant Morebead, lodged wben tbe plaintiff introduced ber evidence and rested ber case. C. S., 567. Tbis assignment of error cannot be sustained. Tbe plaintiff in ber own testimony says : “Morebead did not curse or abuse me at all. Tbe only thing Morebead did was to take bold of Dr. Bruce. . . . Morebead didn’t .scare me.”

Tbe appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Brewer v. RingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Davis v. Keen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Shober v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. Cheek v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Brewer v. . Ring and ValkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. State v. . DilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Powell v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Panion v. CrichtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API