Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 7, 1995No. 93-1918PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.
John J. Mack and Ann Mack, and their insurer, Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co., appeal from the trial court judgment, following a jury trial, awarding Cheryl Armstrong damages resulting from a dog bite she suffered while employed at a dog kennel. They argue that the trial court erred in: (1) denying their motion for summary judgment; and (2) denying their request for a jury question on comparative negligence. They also argue that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's verdict.
This case presents an issue of first impression: whether, under § 174.02(l)(a), STATS, (the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Hopper v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Wilcoxen v. PaigeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Nelson v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Modern Materials, Inc. v. Advanced Tooling Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Riverwood Park, Inc. v. Central Ready-Mixed Concrete, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Tower Ins. Co., Inc. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Mathias v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.