Legal Opinion

Wilcoxen v. Paige

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 16, 1988No. 3-87-0736PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wombacher

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Frederick D. Paige, finding that the plaintiff, Ramona Wilcoxen, was a keeper or harborer of the defendant’s dog and thus could not pursue a cause of action under the Illinois Animal Control Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 8, par. 351 et seq.). The plaintiff appeals.

We note that summary judgment is appropriate only when “the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kolakowski v. VorisIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People Ex Rel. Morrison v. SielaffIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Vanderlei v. HeidemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Bailey v. BlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. Kolakowski v. VorisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Priebe v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Carl v. ResnickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Frost v. Robave, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API