United States v. Rothschild
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26189 (T. D. 31774) and Abstract 27386 (T. D. 32089).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
This appeal brings here for consideration a question of practice by a board of three general appraisers sitting as a classification board.
■ The procedure of the board, as conceded in the record, was as follows;
July 22, 1911, a protest was overruled, as stated by the board, in default of appearance (“no evidence having been introduced at the hearing by the importers, and they having failed to submit their case on the record, and nothing having been found by the board in the record to justify a reversal of the collector’s decision”), it was affirmed by judgment duly entered.
August 21, 1911,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Stone v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- International Trust Co. v. WeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shannon Luminous Material Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- United States v. JaehneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. McGibbonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. GalefCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- United States v. MaierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931