Legal Opinion

United States v. Jaehne

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 6, 1918No. 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 41323. [Oral argument Feb. 13,1918, by Mr Hanson.]

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

■ This appeal presents a question of practice. The Government alleges that the Board of General Appraisers erroneously refused to *308place the present case upon the proper calendar for trial, and thereby-denied the Government an opportunity to submit its evidence upon the issue.

The merchandise is an earthenware bowl which was imported from China and was entered at the port of San Francisco.

The importer demanded free admission for the bowl, upon the claim that it was a work of art produced more than 100 years prior to its importation, and therefore was free of duty under paragraph 656.of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. RothschildCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shannon Luminous Material Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API